[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200831091526.GA4154@mani>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:45:26 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl/actions: Constify static variables
On 0831, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> Constify a couple of static variables which are not modified to allow
> the compiler to put them in read-only memory. Patch 1/3 is probably
> the most important one since those structs contain function pointer.
> The patches are independent, and can be applied in any order.
> Compile-tested only.
>
For the series,
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Thanks,
Mani
> Rikard Falkeborn (3):
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-owl: Constify owl_pinctrl_ops and
> owl_pinmux_ops
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-s700: Constify s700_padinfo[]
> pinctrl: actions: pinctrl-s900: Constify s900_padinfo[]
>
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s700.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists