linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <da6f30896a8fd78635b3ca454d77a5292a9aa76d.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:25:07 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > 
> > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> 
> Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.

There's also linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
that is listed as moderated

Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?