linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009140834010.17999@felia>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:08:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent



On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > > patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> > 
> > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.
> 
> There's also linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> that is listed as moderated
> 
> Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?
>  


Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks:

- linux-usb@...r.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/  (the patch here)

- linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
    - initial patch here was wrong.
    - waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then 
send the correct patch.

- linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org:
  - by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated.
  - no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted.

Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will 
follow.


Lukas