linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-aspeed list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2009131156090.6163@felia>
Date:   Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:57:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
cc:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
        Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-aspeed list remarks consistent



On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:

> Commit f15a3ea80391 ("MAINTAINERS: Add ASPEED BMC GFX DRM driver entry")
> does not mention that linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org is moderated for
> non-subscribers, but the other three entries for
> linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org do.
> 
> By 'majority vote' among entries, let us assume it was just missed here and
> adjust it to be consistent with others.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> ---
> applies cleanly on master and next-20200911
> 
> Joel, please ack.
> David, Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> 
> This patch submission will also show me if linux-aspeed is moderated or
> not. I have not subscribed to linux-aspeed and if it shows up quickly in
> the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer,
> it is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
>

I did quickly get back an moderation email that my email is being held 
back. So, that response validates my patch.

Lukas