linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-aspeed list remarks consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACPK8XdvmUN6XsqGEYMwyb1JhWtm9Nyrje8xXx2zBN4N=+gNow@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:25:41 +0000
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
        Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-aspeed list remarks consistent

On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 09:57, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>
> > Commit f15a3ea80391 ("MAINTAINERS: Add ASPEED BMC GFX DRM driver entry")
> > does not mention that linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org is moderated for
> > non-subscribers, but the other three entries for
> > linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org do.
> >
> > By 'majority vote' among entries, let us assume it was just missed here and
> > adjust it to be consistent with others.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> > ---
> > applies cleanly on master and next-20200911
> >
> > Joel, please ack.
> > David, Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> >
> > This patch submission will also show me if linux-aspeed is moderated or
> > not. I have not subscribed to linux-aspeed and if it shows up quickly in
> > the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer,
> > it is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
> >
>
> I did quickly get back an moderation email that my email is being held
> back. So, that response validates my patch.

The bmc related lists (openbmc@, linux-aspeed@, linux-fsi@) on
ozlabs.org that I own have a soft-moderation policy. The first time
you post a patch I add you to a whitelist. Given the low volume on
these lists this works for me.

I don't know if this necessitates marking the lists as moderated in
MAINTINERS, but if you find that helpful then that's fine with me.

Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>

Cheers,

Joel