| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200914153048.000038ed@Huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:30:48 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@...hat.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jia He <justin.he@....com>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init
function name to be generic
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:38 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
> As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the init function
> name to indicate that generic implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
A few comments inline but more about which layer we do the build protections
at than anything important.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
>
> node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> }
> -
> -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = acpi_numa_init();
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> min_low_pfn = min;
>
> - arm64_numa_init();
> + arch_numa_init();
>
> /*
> - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 73f8b49d485c..a4039dcabd3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> #include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#endif
Could include linux/acpi.h which I think gets you everything you need in here
and has protections against building for non ACPI cases.
> #include <asm/sections.h>
>
> struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = acpi_numa_init();
I wonder if this is the correct level at which to stub this out
as opposed to providing a stub for acpi_numa_init()
and srat_disabled()
At this stage I'm not sure I care too strongly though.
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> *
> * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> */
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> {
> if (!numa_off) {
> - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> return;
> if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> return;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> }
> #endif
>
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists