linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from doorbell

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4017d039fa323a63f89f01b5bf4cf714@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:14:17 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from
 doorbell

Hi Bean,

On 2020-09-11 17:09, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 02:16 +0000, Can Guo wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So your resolution looks good to me.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks so much : )
>> >
>> > You're welcome ... but just remember I have to explain this to
>> > Linus
>> > when the merge window opens.  It would be a lot easier if this
>> > hadn't
>> > happened so please don't make it any worse ...
>> >
>> > James
>> 
>> Sorry that my changes got you confused and thank you for help
>> resolve
>> the
>> conflicts. My change ("scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clearing them
>> from
>> doorbell") is to serve my fixes to ufs error recovery which only got
>> picked
>> up on scsi-queue-5.10. So I checked out to scsi-queue-5.10 and made
>> my
>> changes on the tip of scsi-queue-5.10, below 2 changes were not even
>> present in scsi-queue-5.10 back that time.
> 
> I mentioned here https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11734713/

Do you know when can this change be picked up in scsi-queue-5.10?
If I push my fixes to ufshcd_abort() on scsi-queue-5.10, they will
run into conflicts with this one again, right? How should I move
forward now? Thanks.

Regards,

Can Guo.

> 
> this change (scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clearing them from doorbell)
> has conflicts with the scsi-fixes branch. I don't know which branch is
> the main branch we should focus on.
> 
> 
> Bean