[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1wo0u6bdw.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:21:32 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from
doorbell
Can,
> Do you know when can this change be picked up in scsi-queue-5.10?
> If I push my fixes to ufshcd_abort() on scsi-queue-5.10, they will
> run into conflicts with this one again, right? How should I move
> forward now?
You should be able to use 5.10/scsi-queue as baseline now.
For 5.11 I think I'll do a separate branch for UFS.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists