linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from doorbell

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <149974f6d7073dae363797874fc088bf@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:34:08 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from
 doorbell

On 2020-09-16 04:21, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Can,
> 
>> Do you know when can this change be picked up in scsi-queue-5.10?
>> If I push my fixes to ufshcd_abort() on scsi-queue-5.10, they will
>> run into conflicts with this one again, right? How should I move
>> forward now?
> 
> You should be able to use 5.10/scsi-queue as baseline now.
> 
> For 5.11 I think I'll do a separate branch for UFS.

Thanks for the information.

Regards,

Can Guo.