[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VUPXdHoPaQg=Pp=bH-iORicO+1LjBZ0PNu0=SumC5tYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:13:28 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] kernel: debug: Centralize dbg_[de]activate_sw_breakpoints
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:02 AM Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> During debug trap execution we expect dbg_deactivate_sw_breakpoints()
> to be paired with an dbg_activate_sw_breakpoint(). Currently although
> the calls are paired correctly they are needlessly smeared across three
> different functions. Worse this also results in code to drive polled I/O
> being called with breakpoints activated which, in turn, needlessly
> increases the set of functions that will recursively trap if breakpointed.
>
> Fix this by moving the activation of breakpoints into the debug core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/debug/debug_core.c | 2 ++
> kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 1 -
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_debugger.c | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I like the idea, but previously the kgdb_arch_handle_exception() was
always called after the SW breakpoints were activated. Are you sure
it's OK to swap those two orders across all architectures?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists