lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:13:28 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] kernel: debug: Centralize dbg_[de]activate_sw_breakpoints

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:02 AM Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> During debug trap execution we expect dbg_deactivate_sw_breakpoints()
> to be paired with an dbg_activate_sw_breakpoint(). Currently although
> the calls are paired correctly they are needlessly smeared across three
> different functions. Worse this also results in code to drive polled I/O
> being called with breakpoints activated which, in turn, needlessly
> increases the set of functions that will recursively trap if breakpointed.
>
> Fix this by moving the activation of breakpoints into the debug core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/debug/debug_core.c       | 2 ++
>  kernel/debug/gdbstub.c          | 1 -
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_debugger.c | 2 --
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I like the idea, but previously the kgdb_arch_handle_exception() was
always called after the SW breakpoints were activated.  Are you sure
it's OK to swap those two orders across all architectures?

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ