[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <963815509.21600129983068.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:11:54 +0900
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To: "avri.altman" <avri.altman@....com>, jejb <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
asutoshd <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, beanhuo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"stanley.chu" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
cang <cang@...eaurora.org>, bvanassche <bvanassche@....org>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
CC: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix NOP OUT timeout value
> In some Samsung UFS devices, there is some booting fail issue with
> low-power UFS device. The reason of this issue is the UFS device has a
> little bit longer latency for NOP OUT response. It causes booting fail
> because NOP OUT command is issued during initialization to check whether
> the device transport protocol is ready or not. This issue is resolved by
> releasing NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT value.
>
> NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT: 30ms -> 50ms
>
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 06e2439d523c..5cbd0e9e4ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
>
> /* NOP OUT retries waiting for NOP IN response */
> #define NOP_OUT_RETRIES 10
> -/* Timeout after 30 msecs if NOP OUT hangs without response */
> -#define NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT 30 /* msecs */
> +/* Timeout after 50 msecs if NOP OUT hangs without response */
> +#define NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT 50 /* msecs */
>
> /* Query request retries */
> #define QUERY_REQ_RETRIES 3
> --
> 2.17.1
Hello,
Just a gentle reminder that I'd like some feedback.
Any suggestions here?
Thanks,
Daejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists