linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] kernel.h: Move oops_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200915122125.GG11154@alley>
Date:   Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:21:25 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel.h: Move oops_in_progress to printk.h

On Mon 2020-09-14 18:00:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2020-09-11 20:02:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > The oops_in_progress is defined in printk.c, so it's logical
> > > to move oops_in_progress to printk.h.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Yeah, it makes sense.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> > 
> > I am always a bit afraid of messing with these heavily used includes.
> > Let's see if boots complain about some build failure.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> Just to clarify: I assumed, might be wrongly, that this will go via PRINTK
> tree. If you have something else in mind, please tell, I will route it to
> the corresponding maintainer(s).

I have just pushed the patch into printk/linux.git, branch for-5.10.

I am sorry that I was not clear enough. I wanted to wait at least one
day just in case anyone (human or robot) complains.

Best Regards,
Petr