[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200915125429.GV3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:54:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel.h: Move oops_in_progress to printk.h
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2020-09-14 18:00:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:43:32AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2020-09-11 20:02:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > The oops_in_progress is defined in printk.c, so it's logical
> > > > to move oops_in_progress to printk.h.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Yeah, it makes sense.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> > >
> > > I am always a bit afraid of messing with these heavily used includes.
> > > Let's see if boots complain about some build failure.
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> > Just to clarify: I assumed, might be wrongly, that this will go via PRINTK
> > tree. If you have something else in mind, please tell, I will route it to
> > the corresponding maintainer(s).
>
> I have just pushed the patch into printk/linux.git, branch for-5.10.
>
> I am sorry that I was not clear enough. I wanted to wait at least one
> day just in case anyone (human or robot) complains.
Thank you, Petr, for clarification and applying it!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists