[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916191614.3e189d42@archlinux>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:16:14 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in
ad9467_setup()
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
> isn't recognized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Applied.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
> AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
> return 0;
> default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists