lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916191614.3e189d42@archlinux>
Date:   Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:16:14 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc:     <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in
 ad9467_setup()

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:

> The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
> isn't recognized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>

Applied.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
>  				  AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
>  		return 0;
>  	default:
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  }
>  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ