[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200916082221.72851-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300
From: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
To: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <jic23@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup()
The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
isn't recognized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
---
drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
index 1e8fd83b9bc2..8a6682b567be 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
return 0;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists