[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <339e69c6-947c-031b-8018-f590afe8569e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:01:22 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Rogerio Alves <rcardoso@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, christophe.leroy@....fr, mikey@...ling.org,
jniethe5@...il.com, pedromfc@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
rogealve@...ux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] powerpc/watchpoint: Bug fixes plus new feature
flag
On 9/17/20 6:54 PM, Rogerio Alves wrote:
> On 9/2/20 1:29 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Patch #1 fixes issue for quardword instruction on p10 predecessors.
>> Patch #2 fixes issue for vector instructions.
>> Patch #3 fixes a bug about watchpoint not firing when created with
>> ptrace PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT=N.
>> The fix uses HW_BRK_TYPE_PRIV_ALL for ptrace user which, I
>> guess, should be fine because we don't leak any kernel
>> addresses and PRIV_ALL will also help to cover scenarios when
>> kernel accesses user memory.
>> Patch #4,#5 fixes infinite exception bug, again the bug happens only
>> with CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT=N.
>> Patch #6 fixes two places where we are missing to set hw_len.
>> Patch #7 introduce new feature bit PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_ARCH_31
>> which will be set when running on ISA 3.1 compliant machine.
>> Patch #8 finally adds selftest to test scenarios fixed by patch#2,#3
>> and also moves MODE_EXACT tests outside of BP_RANGE condition.
>>
[...]
>
> Tested this patch set for:
> - SETHWDEBUG when CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT=N = OK
> - Fix exception handling for CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT=N = OK
> - Check for PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_ARCH_31 = OK
> - Fix quarword instruction handling on p10 predecessors = OK
> - Fix handling of vector instructions = OK
>
> Also tested for:
> - Set second watchpoint (P10 Mambo) = OK
> - Infinity loop on sc instruction = OK
Thanks Rogerio!
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists