[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918212403.GE4304@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:24:03 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/8] x86/cet/ibt: Add Kconfig option for user-mode
Indirect Branch Tracking
Hi!
> > > > + help
> > > > + Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) provides protection against
> > > > + CALL-/JMP-oriented programming attacks. It is active when
> > > > + the kernel has this feature enabled, and the processor and
> > > > + the application support it. When this feature is enabled,
> > > > + legacy non-IBT applications continue to work, but without
> > > > + IBT protection.
> > > > +
> > > > + If unsure, say y
> > >
> > > If unsure, say y.
> >
> > Actually, it would be "If unsure, say Y.", to be consistent with the
> > rest of the Kconfig.
> >
> > But I wonder if Yes by default is good idea. Only very new CPUs will
> > support this, right? Are they even available at the market? Should the
> > help text say "if your CPU is Whatever Lake or newer, ...." :-) ?
> >
>
> CET enabled kernel runs on all x86-64 processors. All my machines
> are running the same CET enabled kernel binary.
I believe that.
But enabling CET in kernel is useless on Core 2 Duo machine, right?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists