[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHFW8PTFsmc7ykbrbdOYM6s-y1fpiV=7ee49BXaHjOkCMhBzhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:35:40 +0300
From: Ilie Halip <ilie.halip@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: ignore unreachable trap after call to noreturn functions
> The patch looks good to me. Which versions of Clang do the trap after
> noreturn call? It would be good to have that in the commit message.
I omitted this because it happens with all versions of clang that are
supported for building the kernel. clang-9 is the oldest version that
could build the mainline x86_64 kernel right now, and it has the same
behavior.
Should I send a v2 with this info?
I.H.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists