[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921144546.GB1213381@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:45:46 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
johan@...nel.org, gustavoars@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: yurex: Rearrange code not to need GFP_ATOMIC
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 20.09.2020, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > Move prepare to wait around, so that normal GFP_KERNEL allocation can
> > be used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@...x.de>
> > Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>
> Ehm. Please recheck.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c b/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c
> > index b2e09883c7e2..071f1debebba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c
> > @@ -489,10 +489,10 @@ static ssize_t yurex_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buffer,
> > }
> >
> > /* send the data as the control msg */
> > - prepare_to_wait(&dev->waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > dev_dbg(&dev->interface->dev, "%s - submit %c\n", __func__,
> > dev->cntl_buffer[0]);
> > - retval = usb_submit_urb(dev->cntl_urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + retval = usb_submit_urb(dev->cntl_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> URB completes here. wake_up() returns the task to RUNNING.
>
> > + prepare_to_wait(&dev->waitq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> Task goes to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
>
> > if (retval >= 0)
> > timeout = schedule_timeout(YUREX_WRITE_TIMEOUT);
>
> Task turns into Sleeping Beauty until timeout
>
> > finish_wait(&dev->waitq, &wait);
>
> And here task goes into error reporting as it checks timeout.
Arrgh. Now I feel stupid. (Me and Pavel both, probably.)
Thanks for spotting this.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists