linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v38 15/24] x86/sgx: Enable provisioning for remote attestation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200921180728.GJ5901@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:07:28 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com,
        cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 15/24] x86/sgx: Enable provisioning for remote
 attestation

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:28:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> @@ -181,5 +192,12 @@ int __init sgx_drv_init(void)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = misc_register(&sgx_dev_provision);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Creating /dev/sgx/provision failed with %d.\n", ret);
> +		misc_deregister(&sgx_dev_enclave);

The comment over misc_deregister() says:

 *      Unregister a miscellaneous device that was previously
 *      successfully registered with misc_register().

but this is not a successful registration here, in the if (ret) case...

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h
> index e4063923115b..72747d01c046 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ extern u64 sgx_attributes_reserved_mask;
>  extern u64 sgx_xfrm_reserved_mask;
>  extern u32 sgx_xsave_size_tbl[64];
>  
> +extern const struct file_operations sgx_provision_fops;
> +
>  long sgx_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
>  
>  int sgx_drv_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> index de2ed4f35ffb..4227bca7b477 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
> @@ -673,6 +673,50 @@ static long sgx_ioc_enclave_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_set_attribute - handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION
> + * @filep:	open file to /dev/sgx
       ^^^^^^

Can you guess what my comment to that would be...?

> + * @arg:	userspace pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_provision instance
> + *
> + * Mark the enclave as being allowed to access a restricted attribute bit.
> + * The requested attribute is specified via the attribute_fd field in the
> + * provided struct sgx_enclave_provision.  The attribute_fd must be a
> + * handle to an SGX attribute file, e.g. "/dev/sgx/provision".
> + *
> + * Failure to explicitly request access to a restricted attribute will cause
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_init() to fail.  Currently, the only restricted attribute
> + * is access to the PROVISION_KEY.
> + *
> + * Note, access to the EINITTOKEN_KEY is disallowed entirely.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise
> + */
> +static long sgx_ioc_enclave_provision(struct sgx_encl *encl,
> +					  void __user *arg)

No need for the line break: both function args can fit on the same line.

...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette