linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v38 14/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200921173514.GI5901@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:35:14 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>,
        Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
        Seth Moore <sethmo@...gle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 14/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:28:32PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +static int sgx_einit(struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct, void *token,
> +		     struct sgx_epc_page *secs, u64 *lepubkeyhash)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	sgx_update_lepubkeyhash_msrs(lepubkeyhash, false);

So this will update the cached copies *and* the MSRs itself if what's
cached is stale...

> +	ret = __einit(sigstruct, token, sgx_get_epc_addr(secs));
> +	if (ret == SGX_INVALID_EINITTOKEN) {

... so why would it return this error here?

Definition of this error says:

 * %SGX_INVALID_EINITTOKEN:     EINITTOKEN is invalid and enclave signer's
 *                              public key does not match IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASH.

when you just updated them?!

> +		sgx_update_lepubkeyhash_msrs(lepubkeyhash, true);

So why force a second time?

> +		ret = __einit(sigstruct, token, sgx_get_epc_addr(secs));
> +	}
> +	preempt_enable();
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sgx_encl_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct,
> +			 void *token)
> +{
> +	u64 mrsigner[4];
> +	int ret;
> +	int i;
> +	int j;
> +
> +	/* Deny initializing enclaves with attributes (namely provisioning)
> +	 * that have not been explicitly allowed.
> +	 */

Comments style is with the first line empty:

	/*
	 * A sentence ending with a full-stop.
	 * Another sentence. ...
	 * More sentences. ...
	 */

> +	if (encl->attributes & ~encl->attributes_mask)
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	ret = sgx_get_key_hash(sigstruct->modulus, mrsigner);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ENCLS[EINIT] is interruptible because it has such a high latency,
> +	 * e.g. 50k+ cycles on success. If an IRQ/NMI/SMI becomes pending,
> +	 * EINIT may fail with SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT so that the event can be
> +	 * serviced.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_COUNT; i++) {
> +		for (j = 0; j < SGX_EINIT_SPIN_COUNT; j++) {
> +			ret = sgx_einit(sigstruct, token, encl->secs.epc_page,
> +					mrsigner);
> +			if (ret == SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT)
> +				continue;
> +			else
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ret != SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT)
> +			break;
> +
> +		msleep_interruptible(SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_TIME);
> +
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> +			goto err_out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ret & ENCLS_FAULT_FLAG) {
> +		if (encls_failed(ret))
> +			ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EINIT");
> +
> +		sgx_encl_destroy(encl);
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +	} else if (ret) {
> +		pr_debug("EINIT returned %d\n", ret);
> +		ret = -EPERM;
> +	} else {
> +		atomic_or(SGX_ENCL_INITIALIZED, &encl->flags);
> +	}
> +
> +err_out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_init - handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_INIT
> + *
> + * @filep:	open file to /dev/sgx

Aaand again:

"@encl:       pointer to an enclave instance (via ioctl() file pointer)"

this is also from a previous review.

> + * @arg:	userspace pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_init instance
> + *
> + * Flush any outstanding enqueued EADD operations and perform EINIT.  The
> + * Launch Enclave Public Key Hash MSRs are rewritten as necessary to match
> + * the enclave's MRSIGNER, which is caculated from the provided sigstruct.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + *   0 on success,
> + *   SGX error code on EINIT failure,
> + *   -errno otherwise
> + */
> +static long sgx_ioc_enclave_init(struct sgx_encl *encl, void __user *arg)
> +{

...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette