linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v38 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:51:07 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>,
        Jordan Hand <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
        Seth Moore <sethmo@...gle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:28:23PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Is this appropriate:
> 
> 	/* The extra page in swap space goes to SECS. */
> 	encl_size = secs->size + PAGE_SIZE;
> 
> 	backing = shmem_file_setup("SGX backing", encl_size + (encl_size >> 5),
> 				   VM_NORESERVE);
> 	if (IS_ERR(backing)) {
> 		ret = PTR_ERR(backing);
> 		goto err_out_shrink;
> 	}
>

Yap, thanks.

> I agree with this but I also think it would make sense to rephrase
> "verifying the correctness of the provided SECS" with something more
> informative.
> 
> I would rephrase as:
> 
> "... after checking that the provided data for SECS meets the expectations
> of ENCLS[ECREATE] for an unitialized enclave and size of the address
> space does not surpass the platform expectations. This validation is
> executed by sgx_validate_secs()."

s/executed/done/

> Is this sufficient for you, or do you have further suggestions?

Yes, no further suggestions.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette