linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 18/34] i2c: tegra: Remove likely/unlikely from the code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70e9d6c46611434da229156f8eb8cd12@HQMAIL111.nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:19:41 +0000
From:   Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
CC:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 18/34] i2c: tegra: Remove likely/unlikely from the code

On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 01:39:50 +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The likely/unlikely annotations should be used only in a hot paths of
> performance-critical code. The I2C driver doesn't have such paths, and
> thus, there is no justification for usage of likely/unlikely annotations
> in the code. Hence remove them.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Tested-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>