linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] clk: axi-clk-gen: misc updates to the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:42:24 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mturquette@...libre.com,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] clk: axi-clk-gen: misc updates to the driver

Quoting Moritz Fischer (2020-09-14 19:41:38)
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:11:05AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> > <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > These patches synchronize the driver with the current state in the
> > > Analog Devices Linux tree:
> > >   https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/linux/
> > >
> > > They have been in the tree for about 2-3, so they did receive some
> > > testing.
> > 
> > Ping on this series.
> > Do I need to do a re-send?

I got this patch series twice. Not sure why.

> 
> I've applied the FPGA one, the other ones should go through the clock
> tree I think?

Doesn't patch 6 rely on the FPGA patch? How can that driver build
without the header file?