linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2009222159170.3336@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
cc:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        aaron.ma@...onical.com, admin@...ma.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, hn.chen@...dahitech.com,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, vicamo.yang@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with
 block reads

On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> > Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? It 
> > looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing 
> > machinery before merging.
> 
> Please give me some more days. I am not fully convinced yet that this
> use of I2C_M_RECV_LEN is not broken on some controllers.
> 
> Plus, I'd favor if this could go via I2C tree. It is within I2C where
> the non-trivial changes are. The HID part is just the final bit. Can we
> agree on that?

Absolutely no problem with that. But I'd like to have this ran through 
Benjamin/Hans first too.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs