linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with block reads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200922113646.GA6731@ninjato>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:36:47 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        aaron.ma@...onical.com, admin@...ma.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, hn.chen@...dahitech.com,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, vicamo.yang@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with
 block reads


> Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? It 
> looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing 
> machinery before merging.

Please give me some more days. I am not fully convinced yet that this
use of I2C_M_RECV_LEN is not broken on some controllers.

Plus, I'd favor if this could go via I2C tree. It is within I2C where
the non-trivial changes are. The HID part is just the final bit. Can we
agree on that?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)