lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, aaron.ma@...onical.com, admin@...ma.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, hn.chen@...dahitech.com,
        jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, kai.heng.feng@...onical.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, vicamo.yang@...onical.com,
        wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c xfers with
 block reads

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:

> From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
> 
> This is a fixed resubmission of "[PATCH 0/2] i2c-hid: Save power by reducing i2c
> xfers with block reads". That original patchset did not have enough fixes for
> the designware i2c adapter's I2C_M_RECV_LEN feature, which is documented
> extensively in the original email thread.
> 
> Here is the original cover letter, which still applies:
> "I noticed on my Dell Precision 15 5540 with an i9-9880H that simply putting my
> finger on the touchpad would increase my system's power consumption by 4W, which
> is quite considerable. Resting my finger on the touchpad would generate roughly
> 4000 i2c irqs per second, or roughly 20 i2c irqs per touchpad irq.
> 
> Upon closer inspection, I noticed that the i2c-hid driver would always transfer
> the maximum report size over i2c (which is 60 bytes for my touchpad), but all of
> my touchpad's normal touch events are only 32 bytes long according to the length
> byte contained in the buffer sequence.
> 
> Therefore, I was able to save about 2W of power by passing the I2C_M_RECV_LEN
> flag in i2c-hid, which says to look for the payload length in the first byte of
> the transfer buffer and adjust the i2c transaction accordingly. The only problem
> though is that my i2c controller's driver allows bytes other than the first one
> to be used to retrieve the payload length, which is incorrect according to the
> SMBus spec, and would break my i2c-hid change since not *all* of the reports
> from my touchpad are conforming SMBus block reads.
> 
> This patchset fixes the I2C_M_RECV_LEN behavior in the designware i2c driver and
> modifies i2c-hid to use I2C_M_RECV_LEN to save quite a bit of power. Even if the
> peripheral controlled by i2c-hid doesn't support block reads, the i2c controller
> drivers should cope with this and proceed with the i2c transfer using the
> original requested length."
> 
> Sultan
> 
> Sultan Alsawaf (4):
>   i2c: designware: Fix transfer failures for invalid SMBus block reads
>   i2c: designware: Ensure tx_buf_len is nonzero for SMBus block reads
>   i2c: designware: Allow SMBus block reads up to 255 bytes in length
>   HID: i2c-hid: Use block reads when possible to save power
> 
>  drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-core.c         |  5 ++++-
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Hans, Benjamin, could you please give this patchset some smoke-testing? It 
looks good to me, but I'd like it to get some testing from your testing 
machinery before merging.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists