lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f40889c-94e8-2210-162f-ff62af23e9db@xilinx.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:34:12 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sgoud@...inx.com, nagasure@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix kernel-doc warnings



On 22. 09. 20 13:29, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> for-next/for-linus/for-5.10 and I can't see any issue with
>> applying these patches. Can you please let us know if what
>> tree/branch should be used?
>
> In the first instance I'll try to apply against for-5.10.
>

Thanks. Amit please resend that patches again on the top of for-5.10.

Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ