linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3]spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Update driver to use spi-mem framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160094881929.50579.15096836246623196428.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:00:24 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        nagasure@...inx.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, sgoud@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Update driver to use spi-mem framework

On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:27:05 -0600, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
> This patch series:
>  - Fixes kernel-doc warnings in ZynqMP qspi controller driver file.
>  - Updates the ZynqMP qspi controller driver to use spi-mem framework.
>  - Fixes incorrect indentation in ZynqMP qspi controller driver file.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix kernel-doc warnings
      commit: 91af6eb04a6bbdb8bec8ed6d8ac7850a26604bad
[2/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Update driver to use spi-mem framework
      commit: 1c26372e5aa9e53391a1f8fe0dc7cd93a7e5ba9e
[3/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix incorrect indentation
      commit: f09a433b1e4057e6379b7e1207548fff30d5dca3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark