linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] Asoc:qcom:lpass-cpu:Update dts property read API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:43:19 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
        agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, plai@...eaurora.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, rohitkr@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithk@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] Asoc:qcom:lpass-cpu:Update dts property read API

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 22/09/2020 12:08, Mark Brown wrote:

> I agree with you on this and I see the point, but Rob had a very different
> opinion about the reg-names bindings to start with.

> This topic been discussed in the past with Rob in many instances ex: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@mail.gmail.com/

> According to him, reg-names seems to be highly discouraged as it came along
> for the OMAP folks and was related to the hwmods stuff.

That's very much specific to reg, it's not true of the use of names in
general - Rob mentions cases like interrupts for example.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)