lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:22:38 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>,
        agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, plai@...eaurora.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, rohitkr@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithk@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] Asoc:qcom:lpass-cpu:Update dts property read API



On 22/09/2020 12:08, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On 18/09/2020 07:04, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "lpass-lpaif");
>> Index is always preferred over name w.r.t device tree bindings, so lets
>> stick with that for now!
> It is?  That's not usually the case...
> 
>> Unless you have any strong reason to lookup resource by name?
> Looking things up by name tends to make the DT easier to read (since
> things are named).

I agree with you on this and I see the point, but Rob had a very 
different opinion about the reg-names bindings to start with.

This topic been discussed in the past with Rob in many instances ex: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@mail.gmail.com/

According to him, reg-names seems to be highly discouraged as it came 
along for the OMAP folks and was related to the hwmods stuff.


--srini

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ