[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ft78a8nn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:07:40 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] sched: Massage set_cpus_allowed
On Mon, Sep 21 2020 at 18:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -1899,7 +1900,9 @@ extern void update_group_capacity(struct
>
> extern void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq);
>
> -extern void set_cpus_allowed_common(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
> +#define SCA_CHECK 0x01
> +
needs to move out of the CONFIG_SMP ifdef as it's used even on UP.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists