[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d02ca8m0.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:08:39 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
valentin.schneider@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sched: Fix balance_callback()
On Mon, Sep 21 2020 at 18:35, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> return 0;
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1220,6 +1220,8 @@ static inline void rq_pin_lock(struct rq
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> rq->clock_update_flags &= (RQCF_REQ_SKIP|RQCF_ACT_SKIP);
> rf->clock_update_flags = 0;
> +
> + SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->balance_callback);
fails to compile on !SMP
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists