[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200924160748.GA17927@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:07:48 +0100
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
valentin.schneider@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/topology,schedutil: wrap sched domains rebuild
Hey,
On Thursday 24 Sep 2020 at 14:34:46 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Thursday 24 Sep 2020 at 13:39:35 (+0100), Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > @@ -433,6 +437,7 @@ static bool build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
> > }
> > #else
> > static void free_pd(struct perf_domain *pd) { }
> > +void rebuild_sched_domains_energy(void) { }
>
> Nit: maybe make that stub static inline in a header instead? I guess LTO
> and friends ought to clean that up for you, but it shouldn't hurt to give
> the compiler a little bit of help here.
>
Makes sense and will do!
Thank you,
Ionela.
> Otherwise, LGTM:
>
> Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
>
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL && CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL*/
> >
> > static void free_rootdomain(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists