linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: Chinese translation of Documentation/arm64/amu.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:41:41 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Bailu Lin <bailu.lin@...o.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, harryxiyou@...il.com,
        alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: Chinese translation of
 Documentation/arm64/amu.rst

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 02:21:36 -0700
Bailu Lin <bailu.lin@...o.com> wrote:

> This is a Chinese translated version of Documentation/arm64/amu.rst
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bailu Lin <bailu.lin@...o.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Add index to arm64 directoy.
>  - Fix a document format error.
>  - Correct email encoding format.
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/amu.rst                   |   4 +
>  .../translations/zh_CN/arm64/amu.rst          | 102 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../translations/zh_CN/arm64/index.rst        |   2 +
>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/arm64/amu.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/amu.rst b/Documentation/arm64/amu.rst
> index 452ec8b115c2..a97d1e18876d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/amu.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/amu.rst
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +.. _amu_index:
> +

So that's not a translation, it's an unrelated change that doesn't belong
in this patch.  Asserting a license always needs to be done carefully, and
it needs to be called out as such.

Thanks,

jon