[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71a1831b-b57f-610f-70b6-7d42cb889f20@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:05:49 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com,
ashok.raj@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add shared workqueue support for idxd driver
On 9/24/2020 2:51 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>> Looks like we are cleared on the x86 patches for this series with sign offs
>> from maintainer Boris. Please consider the series for 5.10 inclusion. Thank
>> you!
>
> As I said here, I'd strongly suggest we do this:
>
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org/thread/5FKNWNCCRV3AXUAEXUGQFF4EDQNANF3F/
>
> and Vinod should merge the x86/pasid branch. Otherwise is his branch
> and incomplete you could not have tested it properly.
>
Thanks Boris. Locally I have based on the latest dmaengine/next branch, merged
in the x86/pasid branch, and then applied the series on top for testing. But
yes, if Vinod accepts the series into his dmaengine/next tree, we will need all
the parts for testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists