linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160092820545.310579.6383587246524246608@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 23:16:45 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8250

Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-23 09:10:04)
> On 9/22/20 3:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-11 08:34:07)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..7c0f384a3a42
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,1100 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2018-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> + */
> >> +
> > [...]
> >> +
> >> +static const struct clk_parent_data disp_cc_parent_data_6[] = {
> >> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
> >> +       { .fw_name = "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
> >> +       { .fw_name = "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
> > 
> > Can we remove clk postfix on these clk names?
> > 
> 
> This is consistent with the names used in both sdm845 and sc7180 
> drivers. If this should change then those should be changed too?

If DT isn't using it already then it sounds OK to change the other
SoCs. Otherwise fix it just for this one.