linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fbd25e8-a941-5055-7141-40f7a0608d5c@marek.ca>
Date:   Sun, 27 Sep 2020 15:11:25 -0400
From:   Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for
 SM8250

On 9/24/20 2:16 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-23 09:10:04)
>> On 9/22/20 3:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-11 08:34:07)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..7c0f384a3a42
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1100 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2018-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>> [...]
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct clk_parent_data disp_cc_parent_data_6[] = {
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
>>>
>>> Can we remove clk postfix on these clk names?
>>>
>>
>> This is consistent with the names used in both sdm845 and sc7180
>> drivers. If this should change then those should be changed too?
> 
> If DT isn't using it already then it sounds OK to change the other
> SoCs. Otherwise fix it just for this one.
> 

Both sdm845 and sc7180 DT are using these names. I kept these names in 
the V4 I just sent, keeping things consistent is a lot more beneficial 
than dropping 3 extra characters from the DT names.

The sc7180 dispcc driver is recent and has all of these:

- dp_phy_pll_link_clk
- dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk
- dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
- dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk

So I just can't imagine dropping the clk postfix is actually important.