[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1601018748.21446.43.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:25:48 +0800
From: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek
cpufreq HW
Hi, Rob sir:
Yes, my patch follows
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt way to
define frequency domain.
Is it OK to you if I use the same way to do?
And if there exist any schema problem, please kindly let me know how to
fix it.
My patch reference
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
to use the cpu node.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
Thanks a lot.
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-09-20, 10:27, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > Hi, Viresh & Rob Sir:
> >
> > I will change frequency domain to below and define it in cpufreq_hw
> > schema rather than cpu node.
> >
> > mediatek,freq-domain-0 = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>;
>
> I think it would be better to do it the standard way we have done it elsewhere.
> i.e. follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt, that
> is similar to what you did earlier.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists