[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1601864976.21446.46.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:29:36 +0800
From: Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek
cpufreq HW
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 15:25 +0800, Hector Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Rob sir:
>
> Yes, my patch follows
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt way to
> define frequency domain.
> Is it OK to you if I use the same way to do?
> And if there exist any schema problem, please kindly let me know how to
> fix it.
>
> My patch reference
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
> to use the cpu node.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
Hi, Rob sir:
Sorry to bother you, may we know your comment for this.
Thanks so much.
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 25-09-20, 10:27, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > > Hi, Viresh & Rob Sir:
> > >
> > > I will change frequency domain to below and define it in cpufreq_hw
> > > schema rather than cpu node.
> > >
> > > mediatek,freq-domain-0 = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>;
> >
> > I think it would be better to do it the standard way we have done it elsewhere.
> > i.e. follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt, that
> > is similar to what you did earlier.
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists