linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: support 36bit dma addressing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAATdQgC7GQ5fhkFBg7y6fpzdbFAiv+3ONdnk+jLytumB7a9pXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:11:10 +0800
From:   Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
To:     Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: support 36bit dma addressing

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:27 PM Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com> wrote:
>

[snip]

> > +       if (sp->high_dma) {
> > +               writel(dma_addr >> 32, sp->base + MTK_NOR_REG_DMA_DADR_HB);
> > +               writel((dma_addr + length) >> 32, sp->base + MTK_NOR_REG_DMA_END_DADR_HB);
> > +       }
>
> I remembered kbuild test robot reported a warning on this on 32-bit platforms
> in your v1. [0]
> I don't know what's the fix for this though :(
>
> [0] https://marc.info/?l=linux-spi&m=159982425706940&w=2

yeah, I'm not sure how to handle this properly,

"warning: shift count >= width of type",
(sp->high_dma) is always false on 32bit arm kernel.
I think adding size check on here is unnecessary, should I fix for this warning?

> --
> Regards,
> Chuanhong Guo

Sorry for resending, Chuanhong.