linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Deleted the drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200925091023.GE438822@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:10:23 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     eric@...olt.net, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        sumit.semwal@...aro.org, christian.koenig@....com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Deleted the drm_device declaration

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 04:51:38PM +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> drm_modeset_lock.h already declares struct drm_device, so there's no
> need to declare it in vc4_drv.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>

Just an aside, when submitting patches please use
scripts/get_maintainers.pl to generate the recipient list. Looking through
past few patches from you it seems fairly arbitrary and often misses the
actual maintainers for a given piece of code, which increases the odds the
patch will get lost a lot.

E.g. for this one I'm only like the 5th or so fallback person, and the
main maintainer isn't on the recipient list.

Cheeers, Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> index 8c8d96b..8717a1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>  
>  #include "uapi/drm/vc4_drm.h"
>  
> -struct drm_device;
>  struct drm_gem_object;
>  
>  /* Don't forget to update vc4_bo.c: bo_type_names[] when adding to
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch