linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c96b8ee5-5e96-07fd-de69-ffaa2a4f3bc6@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:07:22 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Max Staudt <max@...as.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/affs: Fix basic permission bits to actually work

Hi Max!

On 8/27/20 5:49 PM, Max Staudt wrote:
> The basic permission bits (protection bits in AmigaOS) have been broken
> in Linux' affs - it would only set bits, but never delete them.
> Also, contrary to the documentation, the Archived bit was not handled.
> 
> Let's fix this for good, and set the bits such that Linux and classic
> AmigaOS can coexist in the most peaceful manner.
> 
> Also, update the documentation to represent the current state of things.
Has there already been any progress on reviewing this?

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913