lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d8f86ab-4333-afa1-6523-e42ae5c7d9b2@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:13:37 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
        arve@...roid.com, tkjos@...roid.com, maco@...roid.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, christian@...uner.io, hridya@...gle.com,
        surenb@...gle.com, minyard@....org, arnd@...db.de,
        mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Introduce Simple atomic and non-atomic counters

On 9/25/20 5:52 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 05:47:14PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> -- Addressed Kees's comments:
>>     1. Non-atomic counters renamed to counter_simple32 and counter_simple64
>>        to clearly indicate size.
>>     2. Added warning for counter_simple* usage and it should be used only
>>        when there is no need for atomicity.
>>     3. Renamed counter_atomic to counter_atomic32 to clearly indicate size.
>>     4. Renamed counter_atomic_long to counter_atomic64 and it now uses
>>        atomic64_t ops and indicates size.
>>     5. Test updated for the API renames.
>>     6. Added helper functions for test results printing
>>     7. Verified that the test module compiles in kunit env. and test
>>        module can be loaded to run the test.
> 
> Thanks for all of this!
> 
>>     8. Updated Documentation to reflect the intent to make the API
>>        restricted so it can never be used to guard object lifetimes
>>        and state management. I left _return ops for now, inc_return
>>        is necessary for now as per the discussion we had on this topic.
> 
> I still *really* do not want dec_return() to exist. That is asking for
> trouble. I'd prefer inc_return() not exist either, but I can live with
> it. ;)
> 

Thanks. I am equally concerned about adding anything that can be used to
guard object lifetimes. So I will make sure this set won't expand and
plan to remove dec_return() if we don't find any usages.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ