[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fd0ef13-77bd-ed84-684a-be364a62f8fa@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 02:14:58 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/22] kvm: mmu: Support zapping SPTEs in the TDP MMU
On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote:
> +/*
> + * If the MMU lock is contended or this thread needs to yield, flushes
> + * the TLBs, releases, the MMU lock, yields, reacquires the MMU lock,
> + * restarts the tdp_iter's walk from the root, and returns true.
> + * If no yield is needed, returns false.
> + */
The comment is not really necessary. :)
Paolo
> +static bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter)
> +{
> + if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> + cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + tdp_iter_refresh_walk(iter);
> + return true;
> + } else {
> + return false;
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists