[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91c07e10-72a9-7570-56a1-2cd50819ae3e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:23:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] kvm: mmu: Add functions to handle changed TDP SPTEs
On 26/09/20 02:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> + handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id,
>> + gfn + (i * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1)),
>> + old_child_spte, 0, level - 1);
>> + }
> Is it worth returning a "flush" value to the caller, to avoid multiple
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address when e.g. zapping a 3rd-level PTE?
Nevermind, this is not possible since you are freeing the page
immediately after kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists