[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <425b098c-dbe0-d614-8e62-1f50b2f63272@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:31:10 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] Introduce the TDP MMU
On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series is the first of two. In this series we add a basic
> implementation of the TDP MMU. In the next series we will improve the
> performance of the TDP MMU and allow it to execute MMU operations
> in parallel.
I have finished rebasing and adding a few cleanups on top, but I don't
have time to test it today. I think the changes shouldn't get too much
in the way of the second series, but I've also pushed your v1 unmodified
to kvm/tdp-mmu for future convenience. I'll await for your feedback in
the meanwhile!
One feature that I noticed is missing is the shrinker. What are your
plans (or opinions) around it?
Also, the code generally assume a 64-bit CPU (i.e. that writes to 64-bit
PTEs are atomic). That is not a big issue, it just needs a small change
on top to make the TDP MMU conditional on CONFIG_X86_64.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists