linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200928173313.GP29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:33:13 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:00:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:26:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Commit
> > > 
> > >   903c5302fa2d ("sched/core: Allow try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() with irqs disabled")
> > > 
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer.
> > > 
> > > I didn't complain about this when it was first present because I figured
> > > it was just a debugging commit that would be removed quickly.  However,
> > > there are now quite a few follow up commits ...
> > 
> > Without Peter's Signed-off-by, I clearly won't be submitting it to the
> > upcoming merge window.
> > 
> > Peter, this is now quite close to your original patch.  May I please
> > add your Signed-off-by?
> 
> Sure!

Much appreciated!!!

But I already replaced that commit with one that moves the call to
try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() an interrupts-enabled region of code.
Which is probably what I should have done to start with...  :-/

							Thanx, Paul