linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200928075729.GC2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:57:29 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:00:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:26:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   903c5302fa2d ("sched/core: Allow try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() with irqs disabled")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer.
> > 
> > I didn't complain about this when it was first present because I figured
> > it was just a debugging commit that would be removed quickly.  However,
> > there are now quite a few follow up commits ...
> 
> Without Peter's Signed-off-by, I clearly won't be submitting it to the
> upcoming merge window.
> 
> Peter, this is now quite close to your original patch.  May I please
> add your Signed-off-by?

Sure!