linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 28 (kernel/bpf/verifier.c)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1762ab05-e8ba-8380-5c68-31642bb96ab4@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:35:21 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 28 (kernel/bpf/verifier.c)

On 9/28/20 4:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20200925:
> 



when CONFIG_NET is not set/enabled:

../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3990:13: error: ‘btf_sock_ids’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘bpf_sock_ops’?
  .btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON],
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
             bpf_sock_ops
  CC      kernel/time/tick-oneshot.o
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3990:26: error: ‘BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON’?
  .btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON],
                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON


-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>